February 23, 2010

Climategate: Climate Change/AGW as Religion

I, as well as many others, have written about the hoax known as Climate Change/AGW.  I a number of post here which any visitor can read and learn the fact, also, they can visit websites like the Climate Depot, but it takes courage.  But the truth will set you free, which brings us to Climate Change/AGW as religion:

 

A blog post at the American Thinker cites George Will at TownHall.com who then cites a 2003 Commonwealth Club, in San Francisco, by Michael Crichton:  Environmentalism as Religion.

 

If a Global Warmer or Changer doesn’t care for AT or George Will surely Michael Crichton will pass muster, so read his speech linked above.  You could read his novel “State of Fear,” or better yet, read “The Bridge” by Keith D. Mano, a novel about eco-totalitarianism and the ordered suicide of the human species. 

 

Fear is the greatest tool of the propagandist, but fortunately, the fear of Climate Change/AGW has fallen with the rise of truth about the fraud of Climate Change/AGW, which was promoted by environmentalists.

 

Posted by: at 11:03 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 179 words, total size 3 kb.

February 17, 2010

Climagegate: Big Oil and Caterpillar jump from sinking ship of Washington’s green policy

BP, once known as British Petroleum plc, has been laying on the Green Ads pretty thick for a number of months.  The multinational tried to sooth the savage and fanatical heart of the Greenies, only to be criticized for supposed ‘greenwashing’ campaign, which is falsely portraying their product, mainly petroleum, and company policies as environmentally friendly.  But, whether BP was being disingenuous or not, those days of soothing the environmental left are coming to a close.

 

The move by BP, along with fellow oil conglomerate ConocoPhillips, and heavy-equipment maker Caterpillar Inc can be seen as a fledgling step toward leaving the Climate Change fiasco and related green policies behind:

 

…Tuesday they [said they] won't renew their membership in the three-year-old U.S. Climate Action Partnership, a broad business-environmental coalition that had been instrumental in building support in Washington for capping emissions of greenhouse gases.

 

[…]

 

On a range of issues, from climate change to health care, skepticism is growing in Washington that Congress will pass any major legislation in a contentious election year in which Republicans are expected to gain seats. For companies, the shifting winds have reduced pressure to find common ground, leading them to pursue their own, sometimes conflicting interests.

 

[…]

 

Spokesmen for ConocoPhillips and BP said the companies still support legislation to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions, but believe they can accomplish more working outside USCAP's umbrella. Caterpillar said it plans to focus on commercializing green technologies.

 

ConocoPhillips's senior vice president for government affairs, Red Cavaney, said the USCAP was focused on getting a climate-change bill passed, whereas Conoco is increasingly concerned with what the details of such a bill would be.

 

Being the 3rd largest global energy company in the world, BP, and ConocoPhillips, as the “third largest integrated energy company in the US and the fifth largest refiner in the world” have an economically vested interest in the environmental policies coming out of the Democrat Congress and the Obama White House, and finally:

 

"USCAP was starting to do more and more on trying to get a bill out without trying to work as much on the substance of it," Mr. Cavaney said.

 

‘Getting the bill done without working out the substance’ sounds familiar, doesn’t it?  

Posted by: at 02:29 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 376 words, total size 6 kb.

February 08, 2010

Climategate: India walks away from the IPCC and its report

As of one the world’s big economic players, India has walked away from the IPCC, stating that the panel is unreliable, putting economist Dr R.K Pachauri, who chairs the UN”s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), is in direct conflict with his own government in India.

 

…false claims have heightened tensions between Dr Pachauri and the government, which had earlier questioned his glacial melting claims. In Autumn, its environment minister Mr Jairam Ramesh said while glacial melting in the Himalayas was a real concern, there was evidence that some were actually advancing despite global warming.

 

Dr Pachauri had dismissed challenges like these as based on “voodoo science”, but last night Mr Ramesh effectively marginalized the IPC chairman even further ... more

 

Posted by: at 01:50 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 131 words, total size 2 kb.

February 02, 2010

Climategate

So much fraud is in climate science simply because so much money is involved, as well as power.  Both are corrupting influences.  Both are fueled by politics and governmental bureaucracy, which includes the UN, remember to think IPCC here.  A UN panel head by an economist, not a scientist, but again with the depth of corruption involved the education of the IPCC head is not relevant.

 

AGW/Climate Change is a fraud, and even the UK Guardian now see it.

 

Strange case of moving weather posts and a scientist under siege

“It is difficult to imagine a more bizarre academic dispute. Where exactly are 42 weather monitoring stations in remote parts of rural China?

But the argument over the weather stations, and how it affects an important set of data on global warming, has led to accusations of scientific fraud and may yet result in a significant revision of a scientific paper that is still cited by the UN's top climate science body.

It also further calls into question the integrity of the scientist at the centre of the scandal over hacked climate emails, the director of the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit (CRU), Dr Phil Jones. The emails suggest that he helped to cover up flaws in temperature data from China that underpinned his research on the strength of recent global warming.”  More

I never put any credence in the whole Global Warming/Climate Change, partly, believe it or not, that if Democrats are for it, there’s something wrong.  

 

“You mean:  if Republicans were for it you’d believe it?”

 

Ah, no, simply because politicizing science isn’t something Republicans do.  See?

Posted by: at 02:34 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 272 words, total size 4 kb.

<< Page 1 of 1 >>
33kb generated in CPU 0.1107, elapsed 0.1307 seconds.
35 queries taking 0.1138 seconds, 107 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
 
Site Meter