May 24, 2010
On March 26 sank the South Korean gunboat, Cheonan in the Yellow Sea sank off the west coast of the
The sinking of the Cheonan is an act of war which the North Korean government denies, and then goes so far as to state that any act of retaliation on the part of
A starving, totalitarian nation with stability issues and an inferiority complex can only grow more restive as another life line is cut, but I will go back to my original assertion that the North Korean government is only seek an excuse. I want to be wrong, but totalitarian governments, who’ve toyed with nuclear weapons, and can only oppress and repress, has to its south, the beautiful, prosperous sister, which is a target of a hateful jealousy.
Now, the real questions are, Does China have any influence in this matter? Does
Will anyone ask publically? All we know is the President of United States is telling
All I can say is, “they have been, for fifty-seven years. The troops are always ready, question is, “Is the president?â€
Posted by: at
01:24 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 352 words, total size 5 kb.
May 20, 2010
Arizona goes International
The president and the president of
If President Felipe Calderon wants help he’d be better off going to the Governor of Arizona, she is proactive, while President Obama is an indecisive rabble rouse—argue with me if you wish—and will off no help, because, in the U.S., there is a demarcation between the states and the federal government. If the President of the
Obama ramps up criticism of Ariz. immigration law
So, North Korea may want a war, fight the war, and then when the last shot is fired and the last call for a human peace is made by North Korea, which the UN and every other panderer with second, and third, North Korea will then demand that South Korea cough up the goodies like land, cash, coastal rights, even occupation.
Not possible? Is it impossible?
Now, where would President Obama stand after the dust settled? That’s a question. But where would be stand when the first (NKorea warns of war if punished for ship sinking) or rather second shot is fired.
Did Scott Brown, new senator of
Generally, we all know that if it’s got a ‘D’ a democrat will vote for it. Now, considering the case of Democrat Mark Critz who ran for and won the Murtha seat…which should’ve been called the people’s, well, Critz ran as a conservative, anti-abortion, pro-gun, and ‘said’ he would’ve voted against Obamacare.
So, he ‘said’ a lot of things, but he’s a Democrat. I cringe when I think it, but generally, elected Democrats tend to lie—a lot, and those voters in PA will learn very soon, which way the mop flops, and they probably won’t find out before November, so the Republican candidate’s got a lot of work before those levers are pulled, and all that work maybe for not.
Consider this also; you can kick a dog all you want as long as you pat it on the head once in awhile. That’s part of the Democrat party methodology.
The difference between the Kennedy and Murtha Seats—A Warning for Republicans
Posted by: at
01:12 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 654 words, total size 9 kb.
May 12, 2010
The president was born. That’s normal. All people are unless you want to be medically technically by saying, “Caesarian section isn’t?†Fine, but Caesarian section isn’t relevant to this particular issue.
Now, the birth certificate issue has become an issue for the Left and Right. The Left because they don’t want to hear about it anymore, and they try and do that by saying those who are interested in just a little piece of paper are just ridiculous, petty, or even crazy. We’ll stick with the word ‘crazy.’ These ‘Birthers’ are ‘crazy.’ Okay, fine, but the Left calling people names about annoying or uncomfortable subjects is normal. It is what they do: Call names.
On the Right, there are those who want the birth certificate subject to go away, because they don’t like being lumped in with the group, the Birthers, and being called crazy. Here I want to take a stab at this.
Two points: One, the whole birth certificate discuss, to an extent is an exercise in rhetoric. Two, the certificate won’t appear. Who really expects it to?
Those wanting to see a BC are being called crazy and are even seen as being nuts. Now, in ten, twenty, thirty, forties years, this issue will still be alive in the minds of some somewhere in America, in the world, and do we wants a bunch of historians and future Americans saying, “Why didn’t someone ask?†These would be the same people who will wonder how certain politicians were elected, and how the ‘MSM got away with it.’ At some point, there must be absolution for those living now, future Americans must know that someone tried, and that is important and necessary.
Again, the issue will go unresolved, but if someone didn’t ask the question, well then, when would the time come when other questions become ‘inconvenient’ to ask. To an extent it is a moral and ethical issue. What is wrong with asking, because you may be called crazy? Every time a progressive questions or name calls anyone that should make us wonder—and then question. We have progressives and elected-Democrats lying, and voting for things they haven’t read. What do we do when questioning that is called ‘being crazy?’ Oh, that’s extreme? It wouldn’t happen?
‘Crazy’ people have resolved important issues by, at the very least, asking a question.
Is being called ‘crazy’ the most horrible thing in the world now? Asking questions is a risky business. Let us not forget, the Soviets locked dissidents up because they were ‘crazy.’
Posted by: at
09:29 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 424 words, total size 5 kb.
35 queries taking 0.2085 seconds, 105 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








