February 02, 2010
So much fraud is in climate science simply because so much money is involved, as well as power. Both are corrupting influences. Both are fueled by politics and governmental bureaucracy, which includes the UN, remember to think IPCC here. A UN panel head by an economist, not a scientist, but again with the depth of corruption involved the education of the IPCC head is not relevant.
AGW/Climate Change is a fraud, and even the UK Guardian now see it.
Strange case of moving weather posts and a scientist under siege
“It is difficult to imagine a more bizarre academic dispute. Where exactly are 42 weather monitoring stations in remote parts of rural
But the argument over the weather stations, and how it affects an important set of data on global warming, has led to accusations of scientific fraud and may yet result in a significant revision of a scientific paper that is still cited by the UN's top climate science body.
It also further calls into question the integrity of the scientist at the centre of the scandal over hacked climate emails, the director of the
I never put any credence in the whole Global Warming/Climate Change, partly, believe it or not, that if Democrats are for it, there’s something wrong.
“You mean: if Republicans were for it you’d believe it?â€
Ah, no, simply because politicizing science isn’t something Republicans do. See?
Posted by: at
02:34 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 272 words, total size 4 kb.
36 queries taking 0.0995 seconds, 103 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
